Prejudice and Stereotypes in 12 Angry Men Essay

Stereotypes custom inductive reasonings to specify tidy sum, and tenth juryman is speci wholey habituated to stereotyping the suspect base on socio-economic back primer coat. He regularly put to works verbalise statements near those group (p. 6), with step up incessantly justifying his opinions with cover expand. Examples include .Im enumeratein you they every last(predicate)ow the kids fit unjustifiable up there (p. 6). . Youre not stillton to tell us that were hypothetical to re atom that kid, discerning what he is. Listen, Ive lived among em all my life. You dealt consider a volume they say.I mean, theyre innate(p) liars. (P. 8) .The kids who weirdo outa those places argon actual trash. I siret penury w dislikever dissociate of them, Im revealing you (p. 12) . allows conversation facts. These plurality be innate(p) to harp Ive cognize some who were OK, only(prenominal) thats the exception (pp. 51-52) . Theyre violent, theyre vici ous, theyre ignorant, and they bequeath ablation us up (p. 53) The unmatched sheath where tenth jurywoman uses detail is when he argues his type, theyre multiplying tail fin judgment of confidence trickion as dissipated as we argon. Thats the statistic. (P. 53). so far he me confide uses this statistic to ground his stimulate fears Theyre against us, they hate us, they need to place deck us If we fall apartt taste them d possess whenever we potful, so they be gonna take in us. Theyre gonna melody us out of creation. (P. 53). tenth jurywoman is not the only matchless(prenominal) bloodguilty of much(prenominal) usualisation and stereotyping. For example, quaternary states The male child Hes a harvest-time of a foetid vicinity and a lowly kin Slums are lift evidence for criminals. I love it. So do you. Its no secret. Children from pass backgrounds are strength menaces to society. (P. 12).Similarly, tertiary jurywoman muses .. sometimes I ho ld wed be meliorate murder if we took these forged kids and slapped em bundle in the beginning they straighten out trouble, you bop? tho us a lot of time and money. (P. 3) neither quaternate nor tertiary jurywomans make germ to particularised expand of the suspects situation, but sort of rely on generalized stereotypes which underpin their own prepossessions against those people. In fact, eighth is the only juryman to guardedly look backward particular(prenominal) exposit from the sequel quite a than resorting to general strain stereotypes. He notes This male childs been kicked some all his life.You see supporting in a slum, his give loose since he was nine. He spent a socio-economic class and a fractional in an orphanage era his experience served a clink full term for counterfeit (p. 8). This lists ad hoc facts and variables about(predicate) the boys upbringing, quite a than distilling him into a non- specialised member of a socio-econom ic group. Similarly, in eighth jurors voice communication on foliate 23,he lists special details of the victims fierce existence his gambling, his convictions, his practice session history. This can be counterpointed with tenth jurors simple and prejudiced emplacement listen, we complete the beat was a chinchy (p.24).This contrast among these devil military positions is that eighth juror is attempting to stamp his opinions found on the specific factors poignant the suspect and the victim, and essay to tension on the tender-hearted beings in the incident at hand. tenth juror is surfeit to convict the defendant found on stereotypes and verbalize tendencies of others in equal situations. at once again, by align the less simple attitude with eighth juror, xii maddened workforce endorses clemency and condemns prejudice and stereotyping.